[systemd-devel] Broken build and CI strategy
Martin Pitt
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Fri Jun 28 08:04:29 PDT 2013
Michael Biebl [2013-06-28 15:41 +0200]:
> 2013/6/28 Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net>:
> > On Fri, 28.06.13 10:06, Holger Hans Peter Freyther (holger at freyther.de) wrote:
> >
> >> Well, that is one part. "make test" really just checks if the test/
> >> directory exists, it doesn't really contribute to the quality control.
> >>
> >> The other thing with "make check" is that it is failing if the build
> >> system doesn't run systemd[1]
It's not actually that bad, the problem is that the test suite assumes
that /etc/machine-id exists which is not the case in minimal build
chroots. This is what I addressed with the patch in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62344 (which we apply in
Ubuntu), but it was rejected upstream. I disagree to the rationale, as
unit tests should not make this kind of assumption about their
environment, but it isn't important enough to argue about this
endlessly. :-)
> Being able to run the systemd test suite without having systemd as pid
> 1 would certainly be nice, as we could then activate the test suite as
> part of our (Debian) build process and it would be run on all the
> different architectures.
We do that in Ubuntu, should work as well in Debian with above patch.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list