[systemd-devel] systemd-fsck change fsck arguments to "-a" -> "-y"
lennart at poettering.net
Fri Mar 1 10:37:45 PST 2013
On Mon, 18.02.13 11:52, Karel Zak (kzak at redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:32:46AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > Hmm, I wonder if -a or -y is the way to go. Karel, as util-linux/fsck
> > > > maintainer, do you have an opinion whether we should use -a or -y for
> > > > automatic, non-interactive fscking? Is -a obsolete and -y the future?
> > >
> > > This is gray zone... there is not explicit standard or conclusion
> > > that -a (or -p) or -y is supported by all fsck.<type> checkers.
> > >
> > > Anyway, it seems that -a is supported on more places.
> I did small investigation and result:
> extN: -a -y
> reaiser: -a -y
> vfat: -a -y
> minix: -a
> cramfs: I'm going to improve fsck.cramfs to accept -a and -y
> xfs: fsck.xfs is dummy shell script, does nothing, accepts everything:-)
> btrfs: has --repair, it seems like synonym for -a (I'll ask for more
> details at btrfs lists)
> ntfs (-3g): does not support options at all
Definitely sounds like the best to stick to "-a" then in systemd's fsck
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the systemd-devel