[systemd-devel] Underlinking in libsystemd-login
Colin Guthrie
gmane at colin.guthr.ie
Wed Mar 13 03:04:01 PDT 2013
'Twas brillig, and Canek Peláez Valdés at 13/03/13 03:40 did gyre and
gimble:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:25:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10.03.13 11:29, Canek Peláez Valdés (caneko at gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>>> In Gentoo we are seeing the following failure with programs linking
>>>> agains libsystemd-login, they all fail with:
>>>>
>>>> /usr/lib64/libsystemd-login.so: undefined reference to `sd_id128_to_string'
>>>> /usr/lib64/libsystemd-login.so: undefined reference to `sd_id128_get_boot'
>>>> /usr/lib64/libsystemd-login.so: undefined reference to `sd_id128_get_machine'
>>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>
>>>> or similar. More info in the bug 62085:
>>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62085
>>>>
>>>> The following patch fixes the issue (at least with udisks,
>>>> gnome-session, gdm, and gnome-shell), but I'm not sure is the correct
>>>> solution. Asking here for guidance.
>>>
>>> Hmm, so the actual sources of the library itself, i.e. sd-login.c don't
>>> use any the sd_id128_xyz functions, and hence we shouldn't apply your
>>> patch. Instead, since d848b9cbfa0ba72 the id128 stuff is pulled in by
>>> specifier.c which is part of the convenience library
>>> libsystemd-shared.so. Or in other words, we currently have a nice dep
>>> loop in place where -shared.so and -id128.so use each other's
>>> functions. We might want to split out the id128 stuff from specifier.c
>>> again? Zbigniew?
>> It seems to be enough to move the specifier.[ch] stuff to
>> libsystemd-units. I'm pushing a fix along those lines now.
>
> Could you please report the commit here so I can test it? I'm not
> subscribed to -commits.
The -commits list is just a convenience mainly for reviewers, but you
can also just look on the cgit web interface and find the commit very
easily if you know what to expect and when it was done etc. In this case
it took only 10 seconds for me to spot:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=ee465038ce86bd3a0f21d5e2723393ff9d78855d
Likely a less time than it took to send the email asking for the sha1 :)
All the best!
Col
--
Colin Guthrie
gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
http://colin.guthr.ie/
Day Job:
Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
Open Source:
Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list