[systemd-devel] [PATCH] condition: add option ConditionArchitecture
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Wed Mar 27 05:21:28 PDT 2013
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:22:14AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Cristian Rodríguez
>
> > El 26/03/13 15:17, Bill Nottingham escribió:
> > > Lukas Nykryn (lnykryn at redhat.com) said:
> > >> ---
> > >> TODO | 2 --
> > >> man/systemd.unit.xml.in | 8 ++++++++
> > >> src/core/condition.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > >> src/core/condition.h | 1 +
> > >> src/core/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 | 1 +
> > >> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Not that this seems wrong, but what is the usage case for this that
> > > can't be solved via package (de)installation?
> >
> > The patch looks fine to me, what it solves ? well.. there may be
> > generic image deployments , who contain the same packages but one of
> > them is only really useful in arch s390 or ppc.. etc..
>
> I think it should be kernel architecture if so, since you might very
> well have multiple userland architectures enabled and working at the
> same time. (So it should be ConditionKernelArchitecture to make it
> clear.)
Shouldn't this be a glob, like ConditionHost=?
Zbyszek
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list