[systemd-devel] [PATCH] core/socket: we only want one event on standard sockets

[Lennart Poettering]

On Wed, 27.11.13 07:46, Shawn Landden (shawn at churchofgit.com) wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:57 PM, David Timothy Strauss
> <david at davidstrauss.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Shawn Landden <shawn at churchofgit.com> wrote:
> >> Are you sure applications can handle the extra file descriptor of
> >> passing both the sockfd
> >> and the acceptfd in this case? I don't see why they wouldn't just do
> >> the accept() themselves?
> >>
> >> Can you explain what you mean here, and how it differs from the
> >> existing MaxConnections.
> >
> > Actually, MaxConnections was exactly what I was thinking of. I agree
> > with you now on Distribute=true only being useful with Accept=false.
> The current code I have has Distribute take a number, but it certainly
> would be possible to use
> the MaxConnections number---however I don't do that as "connections"
> isn't quite the
> right word, and we can't easily change it because it is part of the API.

Yeah, I agree. Let's leave MaxConnections= and Distribute= independent.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat