[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add sabridge for socket activation of traditional daemons

Kay Sievers kay at vrfy.org
Wed Oct 16 06:59:26 PDT 2013


On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:58 AM, David Strauss <david at davidstrauss.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org> wrote:
>> Please give it a name a human can parse and pronounce. :)
>
> sa-bridge? act-bridge? other suggestions?

We really should avoid non-obvious or not commonly used abbreviations.
Neither s nor a are anywhere obvious here.

Also this thing does not actually *activate* anything it just proxies.
And long-running processes should get a d(aemon) at the end.

So why not just call it systemd-socket-proxyd.

> I named it in the spirit of cgtop, systemctl, etc., none of which use
> delimiters.

cg is pretty well known, there is even a libcg. Also command line
tools, can be argued, are nice to have shorter, the proxy just shows
up in ps, and should identify itself without needlessy cryptic names.

Thanks,
Kay


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list