[systemd-devel] Inconsistencies in the systemd.mount documentation

Thomas Bächler thomas at archlinux.org
Wed Sep 11 11:04:55 PDT 2013


Am 11.09.2013 17:08, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> Using FsckPassNo= as a way to add that dep sucks really, because the
> ordering it does is stupid and fsck can do the ordering internally
> anyway these days...

So, shouldn't systemd-fstab-generator omit that entirely, too? Instead,
every mount with pass!=0 should get the correct fsck dependency.

> Automatically adding deps to fsck for all mounts is wrong too, since
> only some block-based file systems need fsck and it would suck having to
> carry a whitelist for thos in systemd.

Fair enough.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20130911/9bee9986/attachment.pgp>


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list