[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 207

[Lennart Poettering]

On Wed, 18.09.13 00:15, Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) wrote:

> > On Tuesday 2013-09-17 21:03, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > >On Fri, 13.09.13 15:15, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 13/09/13 03:16 did gyre and gimble:
> > >> >         * The option "discard" (as known from Debian) is now
> > >> >           synonymous to "allow-discards" in /etc/crypttab. In fact,
> > >> >           the latter is preferred now (since it is easier to remember
> > >> >           and type).
> > >> 
> > >> I think you mean the "*former* is preferred now"? (I cannot see how
> > >> "allow-discards" is easier to type than "discard" ;)
> > >
> > >I clarified this in the NEWS file now. Of course "discard" is the 
> > >preferred name as you guessed.
> > 
> > Humm. That's unfortunate (in a way) that discards is the same
> > allow-discards.
> > 
> > In pam_mount where discard too had been feature-requested (and then
> > implemented according to the way it sounds): "allow-discards"
> > _allows_ discarding, but only "discard" would make it such that
> > the filesystem issues discards to the block layer, leaving the
> > former case for manual discards.
> 
> Hmm, and what the is the underlying between the two in pam_mount? I

                                    ^^^ "difference" is missing here... Sorry.
 
> mean, what does it translate to in mount options?
> 
> Lennart
> 


Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.