[systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] Makefile.am man/udevadm.xml src/libudev src/shared src/test src/udev
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Mon Apr 14 08:52:54 PDT 2014
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 04:58:31PM -0700, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Makefile.am | 6
> man/udevadm.xml | 22 -
> src/libudev/libudev-monitor.c | 17 -
> src/libudev/libudev-queue-private.c | 406 ------------------------------------
> src/libudev/libudev-queue.c | 302 ++------------------------
> src/libudev/libudev.h | 10
> src/shared/udev-util.h | 2
> src/test/test-libudev.c | 24 --
> src/udev/udev-ctrl.c | 2
> src/udev/udevadm-settle.c | 131 +----------
> src/udev/udevd.c | 59 ++---
> 11 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 897 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 9ea28c55a2488e6cd4a44ac5786f12b71ad5bc9f
> Author: Kay Sievers <kay at vrfy.org>
> Date: Sat Apr 12 22:35:50 2014 -0700
>
> udev: remove seqnum API and all assumptions about seqnums
>
> The way the kernel namespaces have been implemented breaks assumptions
> udev made regarding uevent sequence numbers. Creating devices in a
> namespace "steals" uevents and its sequence numbers from the host. It
> confuses the "udevadmin settle" logic, which might block until util a
> timeout is reached, even when no uevent is pending.
>
> Remove any assumptions about sequence numbers and deprecate libudev's
> API exposing these numbers; none of that can reliably be used anymore
> when namespaces are involved.
Hi Kay,
maybe we should make the deprecation process a bit gentler: instead of
ripping out the functionality in one step, instead just deprecate the
functions, and allow people to use them, with the caveat that launching
a namespace and creating devices in it will break this functionality.
Then after a few releases, actually remove the functionality. Not everyone
uses namespaces, and that'd be a nod towards those poeple. Would
that be possible?
Zbyszek
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list