[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] core: let selinux_setup() load policy more than once
Tom Gundersen
teg at jklm.no
Fri Apr 25 15:58:45 PDT 2014
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Will Woods <wwoods at redhat.com> wrote:
> When you switch-root into a new root that has SELinux policy, you're
> supposed to to run selinux_init_load_policy() to set up SELinux and load
> policy. Normally this gets handled by selinux_setup().
>
> But if SELinux was already initialized, selinux_setup() skips loading
> policy and returns 0. So if you load policy normally, and then you
> switch-root to a new root that has new policy, selinux_setup() never
> loads the new policy. What gives?
>
> As far as I can tell, this check is an artifact of how selinux_setup()
> worked when it was first written (see commit c4dcdb9 / systemd v12):
>
> * when systemd starts, run selinux_setup()
> * if selinux_setup() loads policy OK, restart systemd
>
> So the "if policy already loaded, skip load and return 0" check was
> there to prevent an infinite re-exec loop.
>
> Modern systemd only calls selinux_setup() on initial load and after
> switch-root, and selinux_setup() no longer restarts systemd, so we don't
> need that check to guard against the infinite loop anymore.
>
> So: this patch removes the "return 0", thus allowing selinux_setup() to
> actually perform SELinux setup after switch-root.
>
> We still want to check to see if SELinux is initialized, because if
> selinux_init_load_policy() fails *but* SELinux is initialized that means
> we still have (old) policy active. So we don't need to halt if
> enforce=1.
Looks good to me, but I'll leave for others to comment.
Cheers,
Tom
> ---
> src/core/selinux-setup.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/selinux-setup.c b/src/core/selinux-setup.c
> index 6d8bc89..578a18f 100644
> --- a/src/core/selinux-setup.c
> +++ b/src/core/selinux-setup.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ int selinux_setup(bool *loaded_policy) {
> security_context_t con;
> int r;
> union selinux_callback cb;
> + bool initialized = false;
>
> assert(loaded_policy);
>
> @@ -68,13 +69,8 @@ int selinux_setup(bool *loaded_policy) {
> /* Already initialized by somebody else? */
> r = getcon_raw(&con);
> if (r == 0) {
> - bool initialized;
> -
> initialized = !streq(con, "kernel");
> freecon(con);
> -
> - if (initialized)
> - return 0;
> }
>
> /* Make sure we have no fds open while loading the policy and
> @@ -115,9 +111,11 @@ int selinux_setup(bool *loaded_policy) {
> } else {
> log_open();
>
> - if (enforce > 0) {
> + if ((enforce > 0) && (!initialized)) {
> log_error("Failed to load SELinux policy. Freezing.");
> return -EIO;
> + } else if (enforce > 0) {
> + log_warning("Failed to load new SELinux policy. Continuing with old policy.");
> } else
> log_debug("Unable to load SELinux policy. Ignoring.");
> }
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list