[systemd-devel] Implementing resume from hibernation as a systemd unit file

Ivan Shapovalov intelfx100 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 11:36:22 PDT 2014

On Thursday 21 August 2014 at 19:32:01, Simon McVittie wrote:	
> On 21/08/14 19:12, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > Actually, I don't pretty understand the reasoning behind skipping the default
> > dependencies on /usr mount
> (Some of) the default dependencies require that /usr is mounted, so
> mounting /usr cannot depend on them, to avoid a cycle.
> (Or to put it the way round: normal, non-early-boot services should be
> able to assume that /usr is mounted so that they can rely on files in
> /usr/lib or /usr/share without explicitly declaring extra dependencies,
> which again means /usr can't depend on the default dependencies.)

Understood, thanks.

(For the original discussion: so is it better to explicitly "Before=usr.mount"?)

Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20140821/8f223a53/attachment.sig>

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list