[systemd-devel] [RFC] [PATCHv3 0/3] resume: implement support for resuming from hibernation

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Mon Aug 25 18:00:30 PDT 2014

On Mon, 25.08.14 22:23, Ivan Shapovalov (intelfx100 at gmail.com) wrote:

> > So, I am pretty sure we don#t want an explicit After= order here between
> > dbus and systemd-resume at .service...
> > 
> > Hmm, but yuck, I don't see a nice way to fix this for good. Grrr.
> > 
> > I'd probably just merge this as is, and let people who are crazy enough
> > to run sysuers or hwdb-update in the initrd, to figure this out. Let's
> > just wait until this pops up...
> > 
> > Lennart
> So, do you want me to leave "After=systemd-udevd.service" or remove it?
> (An ordering cycle or a waiting timeout?)

Remove it. There's no improvement if you have it, and we don't do it in
other cases that are remotely similar to this: services depend on the
devices they manage, but never on the device manager itself.


Lennart Poettering, Red Hat

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list