[systemd-devel] [PATCH v6 3/3] run: introduce timer support option

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Mon Dec 8 09:49:55 PST 2014

On Tue, 09.12.14 01:13, WaLyong Cho (walyong.cho at samsung.com) wrote:
> > What's the rationale for checking the unit state here? I mean, PID 1
> > should fail anyway in this case, do we realy need to check this name
> > in advance? I mean, such a check is necessarily racy, since the unit
> > might appear while between our client-side check and the actual
> > execution of the service, no?
> I had plan to generate transient timer unit for already existing
> service. 

This might make sense to add one day, but I'd really leave that out
for now.


Lennart Poettering, Red Hat

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list