[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support

Rauta, Alin alin.rauta at intel.com
Thu Dec 11 09:07:54 PST 2014

Hi Johann,

If FDBControlled is no then we don't want to touch the forwarding database table for this port.
If it's yes, then we want to control the FDB table (delete existing entries).

[Install] section can be an alternative. What about "FDB=enable" ? - in case we want to add something else to the install section (SMTH=enable). 

Best Regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of "J├│hann B. Gu├░mundsson"
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 4:57 PM
To: systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support

On 12/11/2014 04:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> What happens if FDBControlled is no, but still FDBEntrys specified?

Cant we simply address those no/yes cases by extending the [Install] section to cover all those [foo] entries

Something like..




With no [Install] section meaning it's not enabled if the existence of those [Foo] entries are not enough?

systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list