[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Re: timedatectl regression in 218: crash with Etc/UTC
Martin Pitt
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Mon Dec 15 04:08:34 PST 2014
Martin Pitt [2014-12-15 12:50 +0100]:
> #7 0x5659c185 in time_get_dst (date=1418644009, tzfile=0x5659e9ee "/etc/localtime", switch_cur=0xffffd81c, zone_cur=0xffffd810,
> dst_cur=0xffffd809, switch_next=0xffffd824, delta_next=0xffffd820, zone_next=0xffffd814, dst_next=0xffffd80a)
> at src/shared/time-dst.c:104
> at src/shared/time-dst.c:104
> type_idxs = 0x565b98d8 ""
> num_types = 1
> types = 0x565b98d8
> zone_names = 0x565b98e0 "UTC"
> st = {st_dev = 40, __pad1 = 348, __st_ino = 351284, st_mode = 33188, st_nlink = 1, st_uid = 0, st_gid = 0, st_rdev = 0,
> __pad2 = 4, st_size = 118, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 8, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1418641254, tv_nsec = 924653672},
> st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1418641254, tv_nsec = 920653672}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1418641254, tv_nsec = 920653672},
> st_ino = 351284}
> num_isstd = 1
> num_isgmt = 1
> tzhead = {tzh_magic = "TZif", tzh_version = "2", tzh_reserved = '\000' <repeats 14 times>,
> tzh_ttisgmtcnt = "\000\000\000\001", tzh_ttisstdcnt = "\000\000\000\001", tzh_leapcnt = "\000\000\000",
> tzh_timecnt = "\000\000\000", tzh_typecnt = "\000\000\000\001", tzh_charcnt = "\000\000\000\004"}
> chars = 4
> i = 1
> total_size = 12
> types_idx = 0
> trans_width = 4
> tzspec_len = 0
> num_leaps = 0
> lo = 4294956851
> hi = 1
> num_transitions = 0
> transitions = 0x565b98d8
> f = 0x565b9970
To clarify:
186 transitions = malloc0(total_size + tzspec_len);
transitions gets 12 bytes allocated (see above frame for values of
variables).
192 types = (struct ttinfo *)((char *)transitions + types_idx);
As types_idx == 0, types == transitions, thus 12 bytes long.
193 zone_names = (char *)types + num_types * sizeof(struct ttinfo);
num_types == 1, thus zone_names == types + 8, i. e. zone_names is 4
bytes. chars is 4 bytes, thus
247 zone_names[chars] = '\0';
writes at zone_names[4] aka transitions[12] which is one byte past the
allocated buffer.
I think the most robust solution would be to just allocate an extra
byte so that we can always actually fit that null byte. Does that
sound ok?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-shared-time-dst-Avoid-buffer-overflow.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 942 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20141215/c06d0ba1/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20141215/c06d0ba1/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list