[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Add SELinuxContext configuration item

Michael Scherer misc at zarb.org
Fri Feb 7 05:22:25 PST 2014

Le jeudi 06 février 2014 à 12:21 -0800, David Timothy Strauss a écrit :
> In order to maximize consistency with newly committed options in
> systemd-nspawn, would it make sense to allow independent configuration
> of the process and file labels instead?

The file label are decided by selinux policy based on the path and/or
process domain, from what I seen.

In the case of systemd-nspawn, it is done by using a specific option of
mount, and only for tmpfs/devpts. 

So I am not sure if this can be done, and i fail to see a usecase for
that ( except having container described in .service, which could be
nice but maybe too much )

Michael Scherer

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list