[systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-rtnl: use correct function convention

Tom Gundersen teg at jklm.no
Thu Feb 20 06:10:29 PST 2014

Hi Jason,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason at zx2c4.com> wrote:
> -        r = sd_rtnl_call(rtnl, message, 0, NULL);
> +        r = sd_rtnl_call(rtnl, NULL, message, 0);

So this is not 'really' a constructor, so the new convention doesn't
apply. The most important thing to me is that we keep sd_rtnl and
sd_bus consistent, so I don't think we should change this.



More information about the systemd-devel mailing list