[systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone
zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Sun Feb 23 16:38:05 PST 2014
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:45:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS.
> > Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though.
> Why not do the same as in the Arch package? Are there any drawbacks? I
> thought that should cover backwards compatibility just fine?
Sure, in the common case it'll work fine. But in principle someone
could have written 82-my-own-rules.rules file, and now it has lower
priority than the new config file.
The rules files - their priority, naming, and semantics - form an
interface which must be kept stable (or versioned in a meaningful way)
like the programming interfaces and the D-Bus interfaces.
More information about the systemd-devel