[systemd-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] Replace mkostemp+unlink with open(O_TMPFILE)
Kay Sievers
kay at vrfy.org
Mon Jan 27 10:06:22 PST 2014
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:54:58PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 03:14:28PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >> Yupp, it's certainly a good idea to make our logging functions safe for
>> >> execution in any context.
>> >>
>> >> What I don't understands though is why mkostemp() would not be safe here?
>> > mkostemp is not on the list of "safe" functions. I looked at the
>> > implementation, and it actually has a static variable, so it really
>> > cannot be called.
>>
>> But does this matter here? The static var is still mixed with random.
>> It seems it will work just fine, at least with the next iteration?
> I guess it's a question whether we want to rely on a specific
> implementation, or on the promises made by standards/documentation.
I think the status-quo of glibc is good enough for us to define our
expectations.
Kay
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list