[systemd-devel] Is there a reason to forcefully create /etc/mtab?
Leonid Isaev
lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Sun Jul 6 11:43:49 PDT 2014
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:13:56PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:44:05PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> >
> > So... the solution would be for distro packages to ship mtab as a symlink to
> > "../proc" instead of "/proc"?
> No, the latter is fine, or even better. The solution is for systmed-tmpfiles
> to stop complaining when the fs is readonly.
Well, I actually would like it to complain (that's why I keep / read-only). I'd
rather change "L+" to "L"...
Thanks,
--
Leonid Isaev
GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6 20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20140706/62672314/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list