[systemd-devel] systemd-networkd fails to get DHCPv4 lease with disabled IPv6

[Alex Crawford]

I don't mean to be pedantic, but I think "any" would be a better choice.

-Alex


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Colin Guthrie <gmane at colin.guthr.ie>
> wrote:
> > 'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 06/07/14 23:32 did gyre and gimble:
> >>> > That worked... thanks. BTW, is yes/true still a valid argument for
> DHCP
> >>> > (because the manpage says otherwise)?
> >> "yes" is a synonym for "both" and "no" for "none".
> >
> > While I know it's not something we need to worry about for a long, long
> > time, should we avoid using the term "both" generally? Perhaps "all" is
> > better? I mean I'm not expecting IPv8 any time soon, but then people
> > thought two digits was enough space to represent the date too :p
>
> Hm, to me "all" sounds strange when we currently only have two...
> Anyawy, I'd be happy to add an "all" option as well (and keep "both"
> as backwards compatibility) once we get IPv8 ;)
>
> -t
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20140714/e8dd5c9e/attachment.html>