[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 211
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Wed Mar 12 08:30:12 PDT 2014
On Wed, 12.03.14 15:12, Colin Guthrie (gmane at colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 12/03/14 00:30 did gyre and gimble:
> > * Two new unit file settings RuntimeDirectory= and
> > RuntimeDirectoryMode= have been added that may be used to
> > manage a per-daemon runtime directories below /run. This is
> > an alternative for setting up directory permissions with
> > tmpfiles snippets, and has the advantage that the runtime
> > directory's lifetime is bound to the daemon runtime and that
> > the daemon starts up with an empty directory each time. This
> > is particularly useful when writing services that drop
> > priviliges using the User= or Group= setting.
>
> Very handy!
>
> Am I correct to assume that if a User=/Group= directive is given that
> said RuntimeDirectory would be owned/group-owned as appropriate?
Yes.
I am wonder though if we should add RuntimeDirectoryUser= and
RuntimeDirectoryGroup= too, so that people can manage runtime
directories with this that belong to unpriviliged users, even if we
start the daemon with priviliges...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list