[systemd-devel] Requiring hardware device and escaping device names

[Kai Hendry]

Thanks Michael for answering, :)

On 26 March 2014 18:59, Michael Biebl <mbiebl at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-03-26 3:56 GMT+01:00 Kai Hendry <hendry at webconverger.com>:
> If your daemon is not functional if the hardware is not present, I'd
> probably start it via a udev rule and SYSTEMD_WANTS.

Do you have an example for this please?

I don't quite understand why I can't I just name the device in the
service file. Why does it have to be so confusing. Still don't
understand the need for escaping... is there a need?

Thank you,