[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix systemd-stdio-bridge symlink

[Umut Tezduyar Lindskog]

On Wednesday, May 7, 2014, Colin Guthrie <gmane at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:

> 'Twas brillig, and Umut Tezduyar Lindskog at 04/03/14 12:44 did gyre and
> gimble:
> >> Does that actually matter much? This ln usage is at build time, not
> install time,
> >> and those stable versions aren't going to upgrade to a current systemd,
> >> because avoiding non-minimal upgrades is the whole point of stable
> distro
> >> releases.
> >
> > As you have stated, it matters for build time and we have build machines
> not running the latest and greatest SW. I wouldn't be surprised if we are
> not alone.
>
> Yeah, some of our build nodes are actually pretty old too, but that
> shouldn't matter really as the building happens inside a chroot with the
> latest packages, which includes latest ln.
>
> Do you really build on an older node against older libs with older ln
> etc? I would have thought you'd also have some kind of chroot on these
> nodes when building too no?


No. We just have virtual machines with Debian Wheezy to do the build.

Umut

>
> Col
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Colin Guthrie
> gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie
> http://colin.guthr.ie/
>
> Day Job:
>   Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
> Open Source:
>   Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
>   PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
>   Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20140513/fe2222d8/attachment-0001.html>