[systemd-devel] [PATCH] s/commandline/command line/g
Jason St. John
jstjohn at purdue.edu
Mon Nov 10 11:58:47 PST 2014
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Lennart Poettering
<lennart at poettering.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 05.11.14 14:56, harald at redhat.com (harald at redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> +++ b/man/systemd-run.xml
>> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ along with systemd; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> </variablelist>
>>
>> <para>All command-line arguments after the first non-option
>> - argument become part of the commandline of the launched
>> + argument become part of the command line of the launched
>> process. If a command is run as service unit, its first argument
>> needs to be an absolute binary path.</para>
>> </refsect1>
>
> I figure there are some more cleanups to be done here... The example
> above shows that we not only use "commandline" and "command line", but
> also "command-line"...
>
> Lennart
>
> --
> Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
"command-line" is the proper spelling when used as an adjective.
"command line" is correct when it is a noun.
For example, "command-line options" is correct, and "enter foo on the
command line" is also correct. But if you switch which example gets
the hyphen, then they are both grammatically *in*correct. In any case,
"commandline" is always incorrect.
A simple find and replace of "command-line" to "command line" will
introduce numerous grammatical errors.
Jason
P.S. Lennart, sorry for the duplicate email. I just realized that my
previous email was sent to you only instead of to the mailing list.
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list