[systemd-devel] [PATCH] networkd: disable tmpfiles and sysusers bits associated with networkd

Łukasz Stelmach l.stelmach at samsung.com
Mon Nov 24 00:30:13 PST 2014


It was <2014-11-21 pią 21:36>, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 21.11.14 17:07, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelmach at samsung.com) wrote:
>
>> On a system configured without networkd and sysusers there still needs
>> to be the unnecessary systemd-network user, otherwise systemd-tmpfiles
>> fails to start.
>> 
>> Move information associated with networkd in tmpfiles.d and sysusers.d
>> to separate files. Do not install it if netwrorkd is not enabled.
>
> In principle looks OK, but I'd prefer if we would write this out with
> m4 (see etc.conf.m4) and keep it in the current files, rather than
> split this up in numerous files.
>
> Especially in the case of /run/systemd/netif this actually matters: if
> we split that out into its own tmpfiles snippet, then packagers would
> most likely put that in its own RPM/DEB if they split out those
> daemons. But this is not advisable in this case, as sd-network (which
> will eventually be a public API of libsystems) needs the directory to
> be around to install an inotify watch. If the directory doesn't exist,
> and the API is used it will fail entirely, which is suboptimal, given
> that networkd might be installed later on, and things should then just
> start to work.

Will it be necessary for this directory to be owned by systemd-network
even without networkd?

-- 
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20141124/8b78f173/attachment.sig>


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list