[systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] 4 commits - man/systemd.mount.xml man/systemd.swap.xml src/core src/fstab-generator src/journal src/shared
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Sun Nov 30 16:27:26 PST 2014
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:15:59AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 01.12.14 01:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek at in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:55:03PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Sun, 30.11.14 01:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek at in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I think we really should close the fd here. audit is actually really a
> > > > > good example why: the audit kernel side has a logic to pass audit msgs
> > > > > to kmsg if no client is listening¹. If we keep the audit fd open, but
> > > > > don't read from it this would mean the kmsg logic is turned off
> > > > > without anyone ever seeing the audit msgs, which is something we
> > > > > really should avoid I guess...
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, made the change now to close it. I hope that makes sense.
> > > > Yeah, I was on the fence with closing the socket or not. Closing
> > > > it is probably better for upstream.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway with F21 and selinux for some reason systemd is not able to
> > > > pass the audit socket to journald. This sounds strange, but it is fairly
> > > > consistent.
> > >
> > > What precisely happens? What does "not able" mean?
> > journald complains that it received a socket of an unknown type,
> > and tries to open audit:
> >
> > [ 2.731174] systemd-journald[500]: Unknown socket passed as file descriptor 4, ignoring.
> > [ 2.731825] audit: type=1400 audit(1417286938.247:4): avc: denied { create } for pid=500 comm="systemd-journal" scontext=system_u:system_r:syslogd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:syslogd_t:s0 tclass=netlink_audit_socket permissive=0
> > [ 2.731840] systemd-journald[500]: Failed to create audit socket, ignoring: Permission denied
> > [ 2.733068] systemd-journald[500]: Fixed max_use=100.0M max_size=12.5M min_size=4.0M keep_free=150.0M
> >
> > lsof (before your patch to close unknown sockets):
> >
> > systemd-j 500 root 0r CHR 1,3 0t0 1028 /dev/null
> > systemd-j 500 root 1w CHR 1,3 0t0 1028 /dev/null
> > systemd-j 500 root 2w CHR 1,3 0t0 1028 /dev/null
> > systemd-j 500 root 3u unix 0xffff880036aef800 0t0 10367 /run/systemd/journal/dev-log
> > systemd-j 500 root 4u CHR 1,3 0t0 22 /null <----
> > systemd-j 500 root 5u unix 0xffff880079278a80 0t0 11298 /run/systemd/journal/stdout
> > systemd-j 500 root 6u unix 0xffff880079278e00 0t0 11301 /run/systemd/journal/socket
> > systemd-j 500 root 7w CHR 1,11 0t0 1034 /dev/kmsg <----
> > systemd-j 500 root 8u a_inode 0,9 0 7526 [eventpoll]
> > systemd-j 500 root 9u CHR 1,11 0t0 1034 /dev/kmsg <----
> > systemd-j 500 root 10r REG 0,3 0 9273 /proc/sys/kernel/hostname
> > systemd-j 500 root 11u a_inode 0,9 0 7526 [signalfd]
> > systemd-j 500 root 12u unix 0xffff880036aef480 0t0 18228 /run/systemd/journal/stdout
> > systemd-j 500 root 13u a_inode 0,9 0 7526 [timerfd]
> > systemd-j 500 root 14u unix 0xffff880078e6ca80 0t0 16663 /run/systemd/journal/stdout
> >
> > 4u is the socket that journald gets instead of the audit socket.
> > 7w and 9u it opens itself.
> >
> > This is with a mostly up-to-date F21 running with selinux in enforcing
> > mode, systemd from yesterday's git.
>
> That is seriously weird.
>
> Is systemd-journald-audit.socket missing in the initrd maybe? Or not started?
Yes, have older systemd there. But it seems to be started
correctly. I attached gdb to systemd and afaict the socket
was opened properly. I'll look at it again :)
Zbyszek
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list