[systemd-devel] A way to better integrate rsyslog into systemd?
Aleksei Besogonov
alex.besogonov at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 22:55:13 PDT 2014
With all the recent noise about systemd abusing its position with the way it takes over logging I’ve been thinking about a way to solve it.
As far as I understand the following holds:
- Systemd takes over /dev/log socket which is normally served by rsyslog (or other syslog daemon).
- That’s really required to make journald-based logging transparent and coherent for most use-cases.
However, it creates a problem for log-heavy applications, because of additional roundtrips between processes. So far I’ve heard people actually using LD_PRELOAD tricks to hack around applications opening the /dev/log file inside the syslog(2). As far as I understand, it’s also not really configurable - the '/dev/log’ string is hardcoded into various libcs (e.g.: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/misc/syslog.c). Recent versions of rsyslog can directly read journald files. But that’s still suboptimal solution, because it introduces an unnecessary layer.
Namespacing each daemon to provide its own /dev tree with custom /dev/log sockets is possible, but impractical.
So I propose the following solution:
1) Add an option to systemd units to allow passing opened /dev/log sockets to rsyslog (using the usual SOL_SOCKET mechanism).
2) Add the corresponding functionality to rsyslog. It should listen on a special socket (perhaps /run/rsyslog/socket_server ?) and treat all the incoming sockets as if they were accepted from /dev/log.
It would also solve the problems with rsyslog using its own SCM_CREDENTIALS lookups.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20141003/41bda138/attachment.html>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list