[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] systemctl: add edit verb
Lennart Poettering
lennart at poettering.net
Mon Oct 20 15:51:15 PDT 2014
On Sat, 18.10.14 18:30, Ronny Chevalier (chevalier.ronny at gmail.com) wrote:
Looks pretty good. A few comments.
> +
> +static int unit_file_copy_if_needed(const char *unit_name, const char *fragment_path, char **new_path) {
> + char *tmp_path;
> + int r;
> +
> + assert(fragment_path);
> + assert(unit_name);
> + assert(new_path);
> +
> + /* If it's a unit for the --user scope there is no need to copy it, it's already in the right directory.
> + * Same if this is --system/--global scope and the file is in {SYSTEM,USER}_CONFIG_UNIT_PATH
> + */
> + if (arg_scope == UNIT_FILE_USER
> + || startswith(fragment_path, SYSTEM_CONFIG_UNIT_PATH)
> + || startswith(fragment_path, USER_CONFIG_UNIT_PATH)) {
> + *new_path = strdup(fragment_path);
> + if (!*new_path)
> + return log_oom();
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + switch (arg_scope) {
> + case UNIT_FILE_SYSTEM:
> + tmp_path = strjoin(SYSTEM_CONFIG_UNIT_PATH, "/", unit_name, NULL);
> + break;
> + case UNIT_FILE_GLOBAL:
> + tmp_path = strjoin(USER_CONFIG_UNIT_PATH, "/", unit_name, NULL);
> + break;
> + default:
> + assert_not_reached("Invalid scope");
> + }
> + if (!tmp_path)
> + return log_oom();
> +
> + if (access(tmp_path, F_OK) == 0) {
> + char response;
> +
> + r = ask_char(&response, "yn", "%s already exists, are you sure to overwrite it with %s? [(y)es, (n)o] ", tmp_path, fragment_path);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + free(tmp_path);
> + return r;
> + }
> + if (response != 'y') {
> + log_warning("%s ignored", unit_name);
> + free(tmp_path);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + r = mkdir_parents(tmp_path, 0755);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + log_error("Failed to create directories for %s: %s", tmp_path, strerror(-r));
> + free(tmp_path);
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + r = copy_file(fragment_path, tmp_path, 0, 0644);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + log_error("Failed to copy %s to %s: %s", fragment_path, tmp_path, strerror(-r));
> + free(tmp_path);
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + *new_path = tmp_path;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int get_editors(char ***editors) {
> + char **tmp_editors = strv_new("nano", "vim", "vi", NULL);
Please avoid calling functions and declaring variables in one line.
Also, there's an OOM check missing for this line.
> + char *editor;
> +
> + /* SYSTEMD_EDITOR takes precedence over EDITOR which takes precedence over VISUAL
> + * If neither SYSTEMD_EDITOR nor EDITOR nor VISUAL are present,
> + * we try to execute well known editors
> + */
> + editor = getenv("SYSTEMD_EDITOR");
> + if (!editor)
> + editor = getenv("EDITOR");
> + if (!editor)
> + editor = getenv("VISUAL");
> +
> + if (editor) {
> + int r;
> +
> + editor = strdup(editor);
> + if (!editor)
> + return log_oom();
> +
> + r = strv_consume_prepend(&tmp_editors, editor);
> + if (r < 0)
> + return log_oom();
> + }
> +
> + *editors = tmp_editors;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Hmm, I don't like this bit. Instead of figuring out the editor in one
step, and then executing it, I'd really prefer if we'd try to execute
the editors one-by-one until we find one that works. When we invoke
the pager we follow a similar logic.
> +
> +static int run_editor(char **paths) {
> + pid_t pid;
> + siginfo_t status;
> + int r;
> +
> + assert(paths);
> +
> + pid = fork();
> + if (pid < 0) {
> + log_error("Failed to fork: %m");
> + return -errno;
> + }
> +
> + if (pid == 0) {
> + _cleanup_strv_free_ char **editors = NULL;
> + char *editor;
> + char **p;
> +
> + r = get_editors(&editors);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
Nitpick: please no {} for single-line if blocks.
> +
> + STRV_FOREACH(p, editors) {
> + _cleanup_strv_free_ char **args = NULL;
> +
> + editor = strdup(*p);
> + if (!editor) {
> + log_oom();
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + args = strv_copy(paths);
> + if (!args) {
> + log_oom();
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + r = strv_consume_prepend(&args, editor);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + log_oom();
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + execvp(editor, args);
> + /* We do not fail if the editor doesn't exist
> + * because we want to try each one of them before
> + * failing.
> + */
> + if (errno != ENOENT) {
> + log_error("Failed to execute %s: %m", editor);
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + log_error("Cannot edit unit(s): No editor available. Please set either SYSTEMD_EDITOR or EDITOR or VISUAL environment variable");
> + _exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
> +
> + r = wait_for_terminate(pid, &status);
> + if (r < 0) {
> + log_error("Failed to wait for child: %s", strerror(-r));
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> + return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status) : -1;
This should really fail with an error message and a real non-success
error code.
> +
> + if (arg_transport != BUS_TRANSPORT_LOCAL) {
> + log_error("Cannot remotely edit units");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (arg_runtime) {
> + log_error("Cannot edit runtime units");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Hmm, why not support this? And imply --runtime or so?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list