[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add timesync-wait tool
Lukasz Stelmach
stlman at poczta.fm
Fri Oct 24 14:13:42 PDT 2014
On 24.10.2014 00:28, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 23.10.14 21:24, Łukasz Stelmach (stlman at poczta.fm) wrote:
>
>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>> + struct timex tbuf;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + memset(&tbuf, 0, sizeof(tbuf));
>
> Please initialize this with "= {}" while declaring, instead of using
> memset() here.
>
>> + r = adjtimex(&tbuf);
>> +
>> + while (r != TIME_OK) {
>
> This check looks wrong. Should check for tbuf.status & STA_UNSYNC, no?
>
> Also, we already have the ntp_synced() call for doing this.
Indeed. I can replace most of the code here with ntp_synced() leaving an
"if" with a break and the sleep();
>> + sleep(1);
>> + /* Unfortunately there seem to be no other way than
>> + polling to get this information. */
>> + memset(&tbuf, 0, sizeof(tbuf));
>
> In this case, use zero(), it's nicer, simpler and less error prone.
>
>> + r = adjtimex(&tbuf);
>> + }
>
> Implementing this with a sleep loop is really ugly. Can't we at least
> calculate the expected sync time from the data returned by adjtimex()?
I don't know how to do it exactly (yet). But my guess is that when the
system starts the information you refer are not good enough to predict
anything?
> The same way as network-wait-online has a timeout this tool should
> probably have one too.
If the timeout is reached the tool exits with a non-zero code. Right?
That makes sense. Is three minutes OK?
Give me a few more evenings to prepare the niceties others have requested.
--
Było mi bardzo miło. Twoje oczy lubią mnie
>Łukasz< i to mnie zgubi (c)SNL
REKLAMA: http://ars-fabrica.eu/ sklep z rękodziełem
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20141024/f7f8947f/attachment.sig>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list