[systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go

[Reindl Harald]

Am 08.04.2015 um 03:02 schrieb Dimitri John Ledkov:
> Is this about progress & control data or all things fsck?
>
> IMHO we do need to continue support ext4, and running fsck.ext4 when
> enforced, at least from initramfs, with progress output to the user
> and ability to cancel

nobody needs to ability to cancel a fsck because hardly anybody has a 
insight if the moment doing so is horrible dangerous and givne that fsck 
don't run for fun why would you want to interrupt it and risk data loss?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150408/cb7034c0/attachment.sig>