[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd 219

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:03:39AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well it's the only logic that can work really, already since the same
> device node is usually known to the kernel by a different name thatn
> to userspace. Trying to always map that is really nasty, as one can
> see with the GPT generator complexity.
> 
> > Wouldn't it be better if there was some other state - e.g. "conflict" if
> > something other than the desired device was mounted to the specified
> > destination?
> 
> I think it's really safe not to consider that a problem.
Yes, especially that the administator must take explicit manual
actions to reach this state. They should remember that they did that.

Zbyszek