[systemd-devel] difference in restart behavior between 219 and 220?

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Mon Jul 27 13:44:43 PDT 2015


On Thu, 09.07.15 23:14, Vadim Berezniker (vadim at berezniker.com) wrote:

> If a service fails to start because a dependency fails but that dependency
> successfully starts after an automatic restart, I would expect the failed
> dependent to attempt to start as well now that its dependency is
> happy.

Hmm, if the automatic restart is configured for the service rather
than the dep (or in addition to), you should get the behaviour you are
looking for, no?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list