[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v221

[Reindl Harald]

Am 19.06.2015 um 16:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.reindl at thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>> Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>>          * If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
>>>            same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable"
>>>            for it (or a related call), then this will now enable both
>>>            (or execute the related operation on both), not just the
>>>            unit.
>>
>> that is an horrible regression in context of someone has written a
>> systemd-unit for commercial software which only ships a sysv-init-script
>> like vmware as example
>
> How so? the native unit always overrides the sysv init script. Hence
> the fact that the init script is enabled shouldn't really matter.

then all is fine, the text above is not clear about that and "now will 
enable both" implies start both

> We did this to be nice to Debian, so that they can support booting
> into sysvinit in parallel to systemd, so that the enable status is
> kept in sync between systemd and sysvinit
the text above is just misleading














-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150619/bddbeb49/attachment.sig>