[systemd-devel] remote-fs dependency/ordering on network

Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net
Mon Jun 22 14:08:32 PDT 2015


On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsynacek at redhat.com) wrote:

> Lukáš Nykrýn <lnykryn at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200:
> >> Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or
> >> network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it
> >> actually is.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >
> > If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be after all netdev mounts
> > and netdev mounts should be after network-online.target.
> 
> I'm sure it should, but I don't see any evidence that it really is. My
> mnt-nfs.mount that was generated by the fstab generator is ordered
> before remote-fs.target, which is correct. However, I can't find any
> dependency between remote-fs.target, and network*. I'm quite puzzled how
> NFS mounts mounted on boot can actually work correctly right now.

There's also remote-fs-pre.target. That's ordered before all NFS
mounts, and that's what the online stuff should be ordered before.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list