[systemd-devel] Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd - crap idea !

[Lennart Poettering]

On Mon, 29.06.15 16:01, jon (jon at jonshouse.co.uk) wrote:

> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 14:21 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > 
> > On 06/29/2015 02:08 PM, jon wrote:
> > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system
> > >
> > > I just installed debian 8.1, on the whole my reaction is mixed, one
> > > thing however really pisses me off more than any other
> > >
> > > "5.6.1. Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd"
> > >
> > > This is not "Stricter" it is a change in default behaviour.
> > >
> > > This change is a shit idea, who do I shout at to get the behaviour
> > > modified to back to sensible ?
> > >
> > 
> > The systemd community only recommends what downstream consumers of it 
> > should do but does not dictate or othewise decided anything how those 
> > consumers eventually decide to implement systemd so if you dont like how 
> > systemd is implemented in Debian you should voice your concerns with the 
> > Debian community.
> Ok
> 
> Who writes/maintains the code that parses "nofail" in /etc/fstab ?
> Who writes/maintains the typical system boot code (whatever has replaced
> rc.sysinit) ?
> 
> I suspect the answer to both is the systemd maintainers, in which case
> is this not the correct place to bitch about it ?

One more mail like this and you will be moderated.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat