[systemd-devel] systemd-networkd and bonding config
Mikhail Morfikov
mmorfikov at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 20:27:21 PST 2015
> The logic here is that when we create a new bond we will create it
> with these settings, but we will not change the settings of a
> preexisting bond, as that may have been created by somebody else we
> don't know about so we figure better leave it alone.
>
> The confusing part here is that the kernel will create bond0 with
> default settings, and we will then not touch that. Ideally there would
> be a kernel config switch to make it not create default devices like
> that, but for the moment I think the best solution is to simply call
> your bond something else. So if you put bond1 everywhere instead
> things should JustWork(TM).
I performed some tests, and I was able to run my system without bond
interfaces. So I think there's nothing that could trigger creation of
these kind of interfaces. The next thing I did was to create a .netdev
file that set bond0 interface (+ the rest of config files), and
here's the log:
# journalctl -b | grep -i bond
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia kernel: bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia systemd-networkd[862]: bond0 : netdev ready
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond0: Enslaving wlan0 as an active interface with an up link
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia systemd-networkd[862]: bond0 : bond0 : could not bring up interface: Invalid argument
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond0: Enslaving eth1 as an active interface with an up link
Mar 05 05:04:12 morfikownia systemd-networkd[862]: bond0 : gained carrier
Mar 05 05:04:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[862]: bond0 : DHCPv4 address 192.168.1.113/24 via 192.168.1.1
Mar 05 05:04:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[862]: bond0 : link configured
As you can see, there's nothing before it, so I don't understand why the
bond0 interface has some problems. Anyway, I changed the files and set
bond1 instead of bond0, and here's the log:
root:~# journalctl -b | grep -i bond
Mar 05 05:09:18 morfikownia kernel: bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Mar 05 05:09:18 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: Setting MII monitoring interval to 1000
Mar 05 05:09:18 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: Setting up delay to 5000
Mar 05 05:09:18 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: Setting down delay to 5000
Mar 05 05:09:18 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : netdev ready
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: Enslaving wlan0 as an active interface with a down link
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : gained carrier
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : bond1 : could not bring up interface: Invalid argument
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : lost carrier
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : DHCPv4 connection considered system critical, ignoring request to reconfigure it.
Mar 05 05:09:19 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: Enslaving eth1 as an active interface with a down link
Mar 05 05:09:20 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: link status up for interface wlan0, enabling it in 0 ms
Mar 05 05:09:20 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: link status definitely up for interface wlan0, 0 Mbps full duplex
Mar 05 05:09:20 morfikownia kernel: bonding: bond1: first active interface up!
Mar 05 05:09:20 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : gained carrier
Mar 05 05:09:22 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : DHCPv4 address 192.168.1.150/24 via 192.168.1.1
Mar 05 05:09:22 morfikownia systemd-networkd[945]: bond1 : link configured
It's a little bit longer, and as you can see there's just bond1 info
and nothing concerning bond0. Also the MAC address changed in this
point -- it looks like the bond0 interface caused that problem.
I thougt that the only one interface was created, but there were
two of them.
The bond0 interface looks like this:
root:~# cat /proc/net//bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
MII Status: down
MII Polling Interval (ms): 0
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0
and the other one:
root:~# cat /proc/net//bonding/bond1
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)
Bonding Mode: load balancing (round-robin)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 1000
Up Delay (ms): 5000
Down Delay (ms): 5000
Slave Interface: wlan0
MII Status: up
Speed: Unknown
Duplex: Unknown
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: c0:cb:38:01:f0:f5
Slave queue ID: 0
Slave Interface: eth1
MII Status: down
Speed: 10 Mbps
Duplex: half
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 3c:4a:92:00:4c:5b
Slave queue ID: 0
and the bond1 works as expected as you may observe.
So why the bond0 interface has been created and by what?
Should that happen because the only thing that creates the
bond interface is connected with systemd itself -- there's no
external application that would be involved in the process.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20150305/40ea23a0/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list