[systemd-devel] systemd-networkd 219 chokes on can device
Mads
mads at ab3.no
Thu Mar 5 05:03:30 PST 2015
>> I have an Atom NM10-based industrial PC with three e1000e devices and
>> a PEAK can device (PCI ID 001c:0008). After updating from 216 to 219,
>> systemd-networkd is unable to get my e1000e-devices up and running. I
>> don't have any configuration for can0 within /etc/systemd/network.
>
> It hit me that I didn't provide a full debug-loglevel debug with
> everything custom disabled. So I created a bugreport at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89442. Please do tell if
> there's anything else I should provide.
>
>> --- a/src/network/networkd-manager.c 2015-02-11 17:30:31.800897770
>> +0100 +++ b/src/network/networkd-manager.c 2015-03-04
>> 15:06:42.091892185 +0100 @@ -322,6 +322,10 @@ switch (type) { case
>> RTM_NEWLINK: + + if (strcmp("can0", name) == 0) + return 0; + if
>> (!link) { /* link is new, so add it */ r = link_add(m, message,
>> &link); @@ -347,6 +351,9 @@ break; case RTM_DELLINK: + + if
>> (strcmp("can0", name) == 0) + return 0; link_drop(link);
>> netdev_drop(netdev);
>
> Any tips for what I'm missing here to create a workaround making
> systemd-networkd not consider can0 as a network device would also be
> appreciated :)
>
> - Mads
I now see that the error with eth0 and eth1 not coming up is due to
missing IPv6 support in my kernel, not due to the existence of a CAN
device. So I changed the wording of the bug report to be a request for
adding CANbus support to systemd-networkd.
Sorry for the noise.
- Mads
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list