[systemd-devel] Possible bug when a dummy service declares After= and/or Conflicts= a .mount unit?
mbiebl at gmail.com
Fri Mar 6 07:17:22 PST 2015
2015-03-06 11:20 GMT+01:00 Didier Roche <didrocks at ubuntu.com>:
> It seems like tmp.mount unit was skipped as nothing declared any explicit
> dependency against it. What seems to confirm this is that if I add any
> enabled foo.service which declares After=tmp.mount, or if I add the After=
> statement to systemd-timesync.service, then I get tmp.mount reliably to
> start (and it was installed as the journal shows up). Does it make sense?
I do have several units which have PrivateTmp=true (cups.service,
timesyncd) which *are* started during boot, yet tmp.mount is not being
activated. Inspecting the units via systemctl shows e.g.
$ systemctl show cups.service -p After -p Requires
Requires=basic.target cups.socket -.mount tmp.mount
After=cups.socket -.mount system.slice tmp.mount basic.target
Why is tmp.mount then not reliably activated during boot here?
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
More information about the systemd-devel