[systemd-devel] [packaging] split of systemd package
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Thu Nov 12 01:46:53 PST 2015
Lennart Poettering [2015-11-12 9:59 +0100]:
> THere's no point in shipping the non-binary version of the hwdb. The
> hwdb isn't a cache, it's a compiled version of the hwdb, and you don't
> the sources around for this.
Won't you need it for udevadm hwdb --update, after you add a new
hwdb.d/ file? Or can we now have multiple compiled dbs, one shipped by
the package and one built dynamically by hwdb --update?
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
More information about the systemd-devel