[systemd-devel] Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, not true

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Fri Dec 2 08:29:32 UTC 2016


Kai Krakow [2016-12-02  8:47 +0100]:
> Am Thu, 17 Nov 2016 18:53:53 +0100
> schrieb Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net>:
> > I now added a small extension to this line: "(to the level the
> > firmware permits this)" ot clarify that we are bound by firmware
> > limitations for this.
> I think this should be pointed out better. In the common case, with
> usual firmwares out there, names change in unpredictable ways if you
> swap hardware. This, of course, totally reverses what the man page says
> about "even when hardware is added/removed"...

It does not *totally* reverse it -- existing interface names remain
stable in a lot of cases actually, just not with your case where the
firmware decides to rearrange the numbering completely (which should
hopefully not be the majority of cases, given how few reports we get
about it). So IMHO the "(to the level the firmware permits this)"
qualification seems to adequately address that?

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list