[systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

[Lennart Poettering]

On Mon, 18.07.16 14:51, Michael Biebl (mbiebl at gmail.com) wrote:

> 2016-07-18 14:46 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <lennart at poettering.net>:
> > I'd really recommend them to switch to SIGRMIN+4 instead. Redefining
> > the meaning of SIGPWR like they are doing is certainly a bad idea.
> >
> > Note that this is even documented here since a long time:
> >
> > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ContainerInterface/
> 
> Hm, the wiki recommends to use SIGRMIN+3, not 4.

either is fine... One is "halt" and one is "poweorff"... In a
container that's kinda the same thing...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat