[systemd-devel] thoughts on different command structure

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Oct 5 19:50:08 UTC 2016

Am 05.10.2016 um 21:42 schrieb Xen:
> Reindl Harald schreef op 05-10-2016 21:33:
>> Am 05.10.2016 um 21:26 schrieb Xen:
>>> Tomasz Torcz schreef op 05-10-2016 19:12:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 07:00:11PM +0200, Xen wrote:
>>>>>  [ … renaming propositions … ]
>>>>   Uh, it is way too late for such changes.  Maybe if you brought this
>>>> five years ago… Right now it would only bring pointless differentation
>>>> between older and newer distributions.  We just started
>>>> unification of all differences in distributions.
>>> Well then create a SystemD 2 and make it the next incarnation :p.
>>> The idea that it can be "too late" to change anything about anything
>>> must surely be seen as a rather weird thing because it would imply that
>>> a 1000 years from now we would still be using the same systemd unless it
>>> was replaced by some other tool for precisely the reason that it didn't
>>> evolve anymore ;-)
>> you sound like we did not have enough "change for the sake of change"
>> in the past 6 years...... realize that the gain of changes needs to
>> *really* outweight the costs all over the world and not just for you
> Well Reindle I was not expecting a positive reply but I need to pee

as long as your are not able to distinct between firstname and lastname 
or at least quote the last name correctly: well, go pee, it's more 
productive than ideas change anything for no reason to bomb us (us is 
endusers and sysadmins) back some years (in fact after RHEL7 has systemd 
more than a decade) in context of consolidation for no gain

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list