[systemd-devel] Service Type for Tomcat
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
j.deboynepollard-newsgroups at ntlworld.com
Wed Apr 19 20:04:07 UTC 2017
"Igal @ Lucee.org" <igal at lucee.org>:
> Examples I see online use forking [...]
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> ... because they are bad examples.
> Read http://jdebp.eu./FGA/systemd-house-of-horror/tomcat.html .
Andrei Borzenkov:
> Service type simple is the worst possible type as it does not provide
> for any synchronization between started process and dependent
> services. So examples that recommend forking are correct (as long
> as forking is implemented correctly).
... which it isn't. Read
http://jdebp.eu./FGA/systemd-house-of-horror/tomcat.html again, properly this
time, and then read
http://jdebp.eu./FGA/unix-daemon-readiness-protocol-problems.html#NooneSpeaksForking
.
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list