[systemd-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] core: mount xenfs, ignore proc-xen.mount (#6442, #6662)

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 01.12.17 at 13:15, <wei.liu2 at citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:11:45AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 01.12.17 at 12:48, <wei.liu2 at citrix.com> wrote:
>> > Suppose at one point we split hardware domain and control domain, which
>> > one will you call Dom0? Which one will get the flag?
>> 
>> There can only be one hardware domain, which will continue to
>> be the one getting XENFEAT_dom0. There could be any number
>> of control domains (perhaps with some coordination between
>> them).
> 
> Right. So XENFEAT_dom0 is not really what Olaf needs. 

Sigh. What does "has access to all the hardware" translate to
for you?

Jan