[systemd-devel] non-dev systemd-devel package for Linux

[Sayeed hyder]

Thanks, I am not confused between udev and devel. Let me explain a bit
more. My understanding is with the devel package, when I include in my
project, I am downloading all the header files and redistributing the code.
With the non-devel runtime package (e.g. libudev1 in Ubuntu), I can avoid
that. Does that clarify my question and confusion?

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Vito Caputo <vcaputo at pengaru.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 07:11:38PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 at 10:52:30 -0700, Sayeed hyder wrote:
> > > Thanks Silvio. Unfortunately, I cannot use devel. IIUC, rhel/centos
> does not
> > > provide a non-dev systemd package? That does not sound right.
> >
> > Are you mixing up the concept of an unstable version that is still under
> > development, and the concept of a package containing development headers
> > to be used to compile your own software? They both have the word
> > "development" in, but the thing that is being developed is different.
> >
>
> I think another source of confusion in this situation is "udev"
> containing the word "dev".  I've only been skimming this thread as it
> develops, but it seemed at times Sayeed is conflating the two to all be
> development packages, perhaps not realizing udev is about *devices*.
>
> Regards,
> Vito Caputo
> _______________________________________________
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20180831/4e4042e5/attachment.html>