[systemd-devel] Requires and After
James Feeney
james at nurealm.net
Wed Jan 2 21:09:01 UTC 2019
On 1/2/19 3:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it's
> pretty obvious when i REQUIRE something that it should be there when i
> get started
Not only is it not "obvious" that "something should be there", it is not true.
You are confusing "Requires=" and "Requisite=".
Some developers and some users are not native English speakers. In some cases, systemd terminology can be ... less than optimal, while, in other situations, users will simply misunderstand the conventional meaning of words.
And, as I mentioned, "Requisite=" is broken in systemd, so that is a different issue.
More information about the systemd-devel
mailing list