[systemd-devel] Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

Ulrich Windl Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de
Tue Jul 9 06:49:32 UTC 2019

Previous message (by thread): [systemd-devel] systemd-timedated: Not possible to set time zone that is a symlink!
Next message (by thread): [systemd-devel] Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

It seems "--state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status" (in version 228). Is this by design?

Regards,
Ulrich

Previous message (by thread): [systemd-devel] systemd-timedated: Not possible to set time zone that is a symlink!
Next message (by thread): [systemd-devel] Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the systemd-devel mailing list