[systemd-devel] rdrand generated with march=winchip-c6 in systemd-241

tedheadster tedheadster at gmail.com
Sun May 19 01:28:57 UTC 2019


On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 6:57 PM Segher Boessenkool
<segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Something like
>
>   *__ebx = *__ecx = *__edx = 0;
>   asm volatile("" : "+r"(*__eax), "+r"(*__ebx), "+r"(*__ecx), "+r"(*__edx));
>   __cpuid (__leaf, *__eax, *__ebx, *__ecx, *__edx);
>
> should do the trick.

Segher,
   that got closer, but not quite there. I made a change to your
suggesting and got what I think I want:

   0xb7e21491 <+81>:    test   $0x200000,%eax
   0xb7e21496 <+86>:    je     0xb7e214c0 <rdrand+128>
   0xb7e21498 <+88>:    xor    %edi,%edi <--- zeroes %edi for use below
   0xb7e2149a <+90>:    mov    %edi,%eax
   0xb7e2149c <+92>:    cpuid
   0xb7e2149e <+94>:    test   %eax,%eax
   0xb7e214a0 <+96>:    je     0xb7e214c0 <rdrand+128>
   0xb7e214a2 <+98>:    mov    %edi,%ebx  <--- zeroes %ebx
   0xb7e214a4 <+100>:   mov    %edi,%ecx <--- zeroes %ecx
   0xb7e214a6 <+102>:   mov    %edi,%edx <--- zeroes %edx
   0xb7e214a8 <+104>:   mov    $0x1,%eax
   0xb7e214ad <+109>:   cpuid
   0xb7e214af <+111>:   shr    $0x1e,%ecx
   0xb7e214b2 <+114>:   and    $0x1,%ecx
   0xb7e214b5 <+117>:   mov    %ecx,0x35a0(%esi)
   0xb7e214bb <+123>:   jmp    0xb7e21458 <rdrand+24>

Here is the patch:

--- cpuid.h.orig        2019-05-14 05:52:11.000000000 -0400
+++ cpuid.h     2019-05-18 21:25:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -251,6 +251,14 @@
   if (__maxlevel == 0 || __maxlevel < __leaf)
     return 0;

+ /* At least one confirmed cpu (Winchip 2) does not set %ecx correctly for
+    cpuid() and leaves garbage in it upon return ('auls' from 'CentaurHauls'
+    in %ebx:%edx:%ecx vendor identification string). Forcibly zero the
+    registers before calling cpuid() as a precaution. */
+
+  *__ebx = *__ecx = *__edx = 0;
+  asm volatile("" : "+b" (*__ebx), "+c" (*__ecx), "+d" (*__edx));
+
   __cpuid (__leaf, *__eax, *__ebx, *__ecx, *__edx);
   return 1;
 }

I tested this with systemd on real hardware and it worked nicely.

- Matthew


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list