[systemd-devel] Still confused with socket activation

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Wed Feb 3 07:00:00 UTC 2021



Am 02.02.21 um 22:25 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
> On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:50 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 02.02.2021 17:59, Lennart Poettering пишет:
>>>
>>> Note that Requires= in almost all cases should be combined with an
>>> order dep of After= onto the same unit.
>>
>> Years ago I asked for example when Requires makes sense without
>> After.
>> Care to show it? I assume you must have use case if you say "in
>> almost all".
> 
> In the GNOME systemd units there are a few places where a Requires= is
> combined with Before=

sounds like complete nonsense

you can not require something at your own to be there but on the other 
hand start before it - at least by common sense


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list